Conveyancer referred to tribunal after £1.2m goes missing from client account
Thu Sep 07 2017News
SRA alleges East London solicitor made improper transfers and failed to redeem property charges
An East London solicitor has been referred to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal after more than a million pounds went missing from a client account.
Ejaz Ahmad’s firm, LG Law Chambers, was closed after an intervention by the Solicitors Regulation Authority in November 2015 and Ahmad’s practising certificate was suspended with immediate effect.
Following an SRA hearing in February, the regulator announced this week that it will prosecute the case before the SDT.
The case has been listed for a hearing on Monday 8 January 2018 after a case management hearing yesterday (6 September).
The SRA alleges that Ahmad allowed improper payments to the sum of £1,203,276.66 to be made from the client account and failed to remedy the shortage.
The regulator says Ahmad also failed to redeem six charges over five properties and had not kept properly written up accounting records.
According to the SRA, Ahmad was acting as a sole practitioner without proper authorisation and his business did not have a registered COLP or COFA in place.
The regulator accused Ahmad of failing to disclose relevant information and accounting records relating to the case and of giving false or misleading information to an SRA officer.
The allegations have not been proven and will be subject to the SDT hearing early next year.
Hannah Gannagé-Stewart, reporter
hannah.gannage-stewart@solicitorsjournal.co.uk
Latest News
FeaturedChris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcementAxiom Ince collapses: Police investigation begins
Tue Oct 03 2023Barrister Carly Walters ordered to be disbarred
Tue Oct 03 2023Fines to increase for employers without robust employment screening
Mon Oct 02 2023IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns
Mon Oct 02 2023Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers
Mon Oct 02 2023The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
Fri Sep 29 2023Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce
Fri Sep 29 2023Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system
Fri Sep 29 2023Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors
Fri Sep 29 2023
NewsWed Oct 04 2023
Chris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Chris Packham legal challenge to Prime Minister over axing of timetable on vehicles and boilers
OpinionTue Oct 03 2023
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
Stephanie Miers looks at the pros and cons of mediation vs. court, ahead of plans to make mediation compulsory for civil claims up to £10,000
NewsTue Oct 03 2023
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has now taken over management of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF).
NewsTue Oct 03 2023
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
The Law Society of England and Wales has expressed concern over the extension of (FRC) and has urgently sought clarity from government on certain aspects of the regime.
SJ InterviewMon Sep 25 2023
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Hannah Ambrose is an international arbitration partner at Herbert Smith Freehills. She talks to Solicitors Journal about her practice and the Law Commission's recent proposals to update the Arbitration Act 1996.
ForewordFri Sep 08 2023
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Under the law, should your right to express your opinion – be it on politics, the environment, abortion, or anything else – trump my right to go about my business unhindered, whether or not I happen to agree with your opinion?