EditorSolicitors Journal

Commission backs conservation covenants to protect wildlife and heritage

Commission backs conservation covenants to protect wildlife and heritage

Existing methods 'complex and costly' and lead to 'piecemeal approach'

The Law Commission has called for the introduction of conservation covenants into English law to help protect wildlife and historic buildings.

The commission said, in a consultation launched today, that covenants were already used in various other jurisdictions, including in Scotland, the USA, Australia and New Zealand.

Without them, the commission argued, England and Wales would be left with a number of "complex and costly" legal methods to protect land, which were "not only inefficient, but have led to a piecemeal approach" to private conservation of land.

"Conservation covenants would allow us to safeguard our natural environment and heritage for future generations," law commissioner professor Elizabeth Cooke (pictured) said.

"Such agreements have been used successfully in other places in the world for some time. In England and Wales, landowners who want to use their land to support conservation must currently rely on expensive and insecure workarounds. "There is a clear gap in the law and the commission is asking, is it time for that gap to be filled?"

The commission said the introduction of conservation covenants would "allow landowners voluntarily to create binding obligations on their own land to meet a conservation objective, such as preserving woodland, cultivating a particular species of plant or animal, or farming land in a certain way."

Unlike restrictive covenants, they could be created over both leasehold and freehold land, did not need to be created for the benefit of neighbouring land and could be positive as well as negative.

There were already statutory exceptions to the restrictive covenants regime, the commission argued, for example allowing the National Trust to create covenants without owning neighbouring land.

The commission said only 'responsible bodies' such as charities and registered charities should be able to make conservation covenants, which would be statutory obligations rather than traditional property rights.

It added that landowners and responsible bodies should be able to agree between themselves when a covenant should be amended.

Tags:
AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Parents and carers to be given new employment protections

Fri May 26 2023

Committee finds plans to level up the country risk failure due to funding concerns

Fri May 26 2023

Government consults on enforcement mechanisms for animal health and welfare offences

Fri May 26 2023

Government expands legal aid eligibility

Thu May 25 2023

Council of Europe identifies serious concerns affecting minorities in the UK

Thu May 25 2023

ONS finds international migration to the UK hit new high in 2022

Thu May 25 2023

Government consults on plans to reduce reporting burdens on businesses

Wed May 24 2023

Committee report finds government not taking harms from alcohol seriously enough

Wed May 24 2023

Committee seeks views on the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill

Wed May 24 2023
Featured
A closer look at the trademark dispute between retail giants Lidl and Tesco
The UK maternity care crisis: £5bn in avoidable damages claims
Understanding Chinese underground banking and the risks
The building blocks for a successful collaborative culture
SJ Interview: James Fulforth
Long-awaited reports and controversial bills dominate