EditorSolicitors Journal

Chambers releases mock virtual RTA trial film

Chambers releases mock virtual RTA trial film

A future increase in virtual hearings is likely, says one of the barristers behind a mock virtual trial film recording

An increase in virtual hearings in future is likely, says one of the barristers behind the recent release of a mock virtual fast-track trial film recording.

Jamie Hill of Nine St John Street Chambers said the aim of the mock remote trial was to demonstrate to judges, solicitors and witnesses that remote working should not mean trials are simple adjourned, as has been the current practice, but many can go ahead remotely.

The film was accompanied by the publication of guidance on e-bundling.

Hill, who prepared the e-bundling guidance pending the publication of more detailed national guidance for the civil courts, said e-bundling will be new to many lawyers litigating matters in the county court – and will need to quickly adapt.

The film demonstrates the use of remote technology to undertake a fast track road traffic accident trial on the issue of liability via Zoom.

It was also conducted using Microsoft Teams which chambers said it found just as effective.

However, not all cases are suitable for remote hearings.

Hill commented: “It will be for the court, with the parties’ assistance, to triage cases to ensure that they can be fairly and safely disposed of remotely.” 

Where one of the parties is a litigant in person (LiP), Hill said it might not be able to be heard remotely; but this will depend upon the views of the parties – especially the LiP.

Individual circumstances and characteristics will have to be taken into account. 

He commented: “A determinative factor would be the skills and confidence the LiP has with using technology.

“LiPs must not be locked out of remote hearings in which they could fairly participate simply because they are unrepresented.”

He envisaged them being given guides on how to use the video conferring package the court has decided to use; and the short film showing the mock remote trial could also help them.

There may also be security concerns around remote hearings and trials.

Hill said it will be for the court to satisfy itself that hearings are sufficiently secure, but added: “Any security concerns can be allayed with the use of passwords, virtual waiting rooms, host controls to lock the room once all participants have joined, encryption and so on.”

Will the necessity for remote hearings during the pandemic change the future of litigation?  

Hill comments: “An increase in virtual hearings in the future is likely. 

“There are advantages, such as the sharing of maps on the screen; doing this online is much easier than passing a laptop around a physical court.”

But he said that when possible, it will be advantageous for most hearings to return to ‘in person’. 

“However good the online experience is”, he observed, “it is no match for the real thing.”

He added: “The obvious ideal point to reach is where the courts can confidently host both in person and virtual hearings effectively, giving litigants the ability to decide what works best for them. 

“With the right technology it should be possible, in the right case, for one side to attend in person and another remotely.”

Latest News

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023

Powers of attorney modernised as legislation allows CILEX Lawyers to certify LPA copies for the first time

Thu Sep 21 2023

Stark contrast between Government response to Post Office Horizon victims and Infected Blood

Wed Sep 20 2023

ACSO comments on the Justice select Committee report:

Wed Sep 20 2023

Campaigners win permission to appeal against Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station ruling

Tue Sep 19 2023

Pre-inquest review into the deaths of Reading murder victims, James Furlong, Dr David Wails and Joseph Ritchie-Bennett

Mon Sep 18 2023
FeaturedAudit reform: if not now, when?
Audit reform: if not now, when?
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social mediaSJ interview: Adrian Chopin
SJ interview: Adrian Chopin
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?