Deputy EditorSolicitors Journal

APIL calls for clarity on medical reports

APIL calls for clarity on medical reports

APIL has said there is insufficient clarity in the government’s response to its consultation on the future provision of medical reports in road traffic accident (RTA) related claims. The response from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) will form part of a number of changes to support the increase to the small claims track limit for RTA-related personal injury claims next April. Key measures announced in the response include extending the MedCo system to cover the provision of initial medical reports for all RTA-related personal injury claims under £5000. However, calls to reduce the current level of £180 plus VAT for initial soft tissue reports was rejected. APIL president Gordon Dalyell said the report fails to provide clarity when people are looking for answers on how the new small claims system will work.

He added: “The government needs to address the substantial financial barrier injured people will face if they must pay £180 up front for their medical reports when liability is denied. “Not everyone can afford this. It would be very easy for insurers to play the game of denying liability in the knowledge that it will put genuine injured people off taking the claim further simply because they can’t afford the medical report.” However, the MoJ report said: “We are not persuaded by either the views presented, or the data submitted by stakeholders that it would be inappropriate to maintain the current level of £180 plus VAT for initial soft tissue reports. “These decisions will provide certainty to both claimants and to those providing reports as to the cost of obtaining medical evidence in support of a claim. “We will however, continue to monitor this issue with a view to reviewing this at an appropriate point following the implementation of the reforms in April 2020.” The government’s plans also include limiting the provision of initial medical reports for non-soft tissue personal injury claims – whether or not accompanied by a soft tissue injury – to general practitioners and accident and emergency consultants only.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka

Wed Sep 27 2023

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023
FeaturedJustice delayed as thousands of cases wait more than two years to be heard
Justice delayed as thousands of cases wait more than two years to be heard
Solicitors warned over immigration services
Solicitors warned over immigration services
The Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
The Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?