News EditorSolicitors Journal

APIL and MASS to intervene in Court of Appeal whiplash ‘mixed injuries’ test cases

APIL and MASS to intervene in Court of Appeal whiplash ‘mixed injuries’ test cases

The intervention by APIL and MASS is made on behalf of the claimant group

The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) and the Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) have been given permission by the Court of Appeal to intervene in two test cases to help establish levels of compensation to be awarded for ‘mixed’ whiplash injuries.

New compensation tariffs were introduced for whiplash cases last year, but legislation failed to address the way damages should be calculated in cases where whiplash injuries are combined with other injuries which are not subject to a tariff.

To address this, two groups representing claimants and defendants were brought together and facilitated by the Motor Insurers Bureau to create a framework for bringing a basket of test cases direct to the Court of Appeal, with the aim of resolving the problem to ensure injured people are compensated properly. The intervention by APIL and MASS is made on behalf of the claimant group.

“Finding test cases has been extremely difficult because of ongoing and well-documented problems with the new portal which was set up to deal with low value traffic claims,” said APIL secretary Brett Dixon.

“There is a broad range of issues to be considered in mixed injury claims and the test cases which are being brought outside of the stakeholder framework have provided a very timely opportunity for us to gain clarity from the Court of Appeal about how these issues should be dealt with as quickly as possible.”

Sue Brown, chair of MASS, said “We are really pleased that the Court of Appeal has recognised the need for urgent guidance on these issues.

“Our concern, and that of the wider stakeholder group, has always been that the Court of Appeal is given the opportunity to consider the full range of scenarios that will affect those making a claim for whiplash and non-whiplash injuries. Our intervention will provide the Court with the opportunity to consider these wider points and give injured people the certainty they deserve.”

The Court of Appeal granted the request to ‘leapfrog’ the High Court in two conjoined appeals from Birkenhead County Court. The expedited appeals will be heard on either 30 November or 1 December.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Legal job numbers increase but applications decline

Fri Sep 29 2023

BARBRI candidates outperform SRA average by 13%

Fri Sep 29 2023

Justice delayed as thousands of cases wait more than two years to be heard

Thu Sep 28 2023

Solicitors warned over immigration services

Thu Sep 28 2023

New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers

Wed Sep 27 2023

Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka

Wed Sep 27 2023

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023
FeaturedThe Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid
Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce
Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce
Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system
Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system
Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors
Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?