Regarding cost as a justification to age discrimination alongside ‘other factors’ involves unsatisfactory game playing for both employees and employers, says Deshpal Panesar
The Court of Appeal ruling in Woodcock v Cumbria PCT  EWCA Civ 330 was expected to provide clear guidance on whether cost can justify age discrimination and other forms of discrimination where a justification defence applies. Regrettably, the guidance that emerged is not clear.
The express legal position with regard to justification is deceptively simple: for states seeking to justify their legislation, cost cannot amount to a legitimate aim; for employers, cost alone cannot amount to a legitimate aim but it can be a factor – a principle re-stated by the Court of Appeal in Woodcock.
However the facts of Woodcock...
This article is part of our subscription-based access. Please pick one of the options below to continue.
Already registered? Login to access premium content
The Corporate IP Licence is tailored to your firm, making it the most cost effective way for the firm to access Solicitors Journal, and enables the firm to remain compliant with copyright and our Terms and Conditions. This gives you the ability to print and circulate articles within the firm.
To enquire about a Corporate IP Licence for your firm, please contact our Subscriptions Manager on email@example.com.