News EditorSolicitors Journal

Committee report warns that police cooperation between the UK and EU could end without action on trade agreement

Committee report warns that police cooperation between the UK and EU could end without action on trade agreement

The concerns relate to the EU's proposed regulation 

The House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee published its findings on its latest analysis of the EU laws that could impact the UK on 4 April, which warns that cross-border cooperation between UK and EU police could end if proposed changes to the EU rules on police database information sharing enter into force without a deal to update the UK–EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA).

According to the Committee, if the UK government does not align with the EU’s proposed regulation of 8 December 2021 on automated data exchange for police cooperation, otherwise known as the ‘Prüm II’ proposals, UK police could be locked out of EU-wide databases and blocked from accessing biometric information on criminals operating in Europe, impacting the government’s ability to target organised crime operating across borders. The TCA provides the EU with the ability to suspend the existing Prüm cooperation if the EU rules are ‘substantially’ changed and the UK does not agree to those changes being reflected in an updated version of the TCA.

The proposed Prüm II regulation includes amendments to the current framework for cross-border police cooperation and data exchanges within the EU and includes new categories of data such as digital facial images, police records and, potentially, driving licences.

Alongside the publication of the report, Committee Chairman Sir William Cash has written to Security Minister, Tom Tugendhat, detailing the concerns and requesting clarity on how the government intends to respond to the EU’s proposed regulation. The Committee’s letter also requests that the government publishes a full impact assessment before taking any decision on updates to the TCA and highlights the need for appropriate parliamentary scrutiny.

In addition to this, the Committee’s letter also highlights concerns regarding the increased scope that would be brought about by the proposed regulation, which ‘would increase the amount of personal data that could be searched by automated means and shared with the UK’s law enforcement counterparts in the EU. As the pool of searchable data increases, so too does the risk of false matches and wrongful incrimination.’

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023
FeaturedChanging tactics in litigation – crystal ball gazing
Changing tactics in litigation – crystal ball gazing
UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation
UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation
Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law
Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law
B Corps: the future for law firms?
B Corps: the future for law firms?
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?