ACS Law claims to be subject to 'public scrutiny'

Cases brought by ACS Law on behalf of Media CAT over allegedly illegal file sharing are to be given full judicial scrutiny after the patents county court refused an application to discontinue.

08 Feb 2011

Cases brought by ACS Law on behalf of Media CAT over allegedly illegal file sharing are to be given full judicial scrutiny after the patents county court refused an application to discontinue.

Andrew Crossley, the sole practitioner behind ACS Law, made the application through his counsel Tim Ludbrook on 25 January, saying he had been the object of bomb threats and wanted to stop all file sharing enforcement work.

Last week he reportedly closed down his firm but the SRA is still to be officially notified of the firm’s closure.

Refusing to allow the notices of discontinuance, Judge Birss QC said they would be an abuse of process and would give both Media CAT and ACS Law an “unwarranted collateral advantage” in that they w...

Want to read on?

This article is part of our subscription-based access. Please pick one of the options below to continue.
Already registered? Login to access premium content

Single User

  • - 10 issues a year delivered to you
  • - Digital edition of the magazine
  • - Access to premium content
  • - Access to the SJ Archives
  • - Weekly email newsletter
  • - Access to the SJ community online
  • - Advanced search feature
  • - Online support
  • - Access to SJ app- coming soon!
  • - 6 special focuses per year
  • - Special offers on SJ and IICJ events

Corporate User

The Corporate IP Licence is tailored to your firm, making it the most cost effective way for the firm to access Solicitors Journal, and enables the firm to remain compliant with copyright and our Terms and Conditions. This gives you the ability to print and circulate articles within the firm.

To enquire about a Corporate IP Licence for your firm, please contact our Subscriptions Manager on george.miller@solicitorsjournal.com.