Standard of care

Eleanor Kilner considers a recent case that highlights the importance of the factual matrix and context in professional negligence claims

15 Mar 2016

The recent case of Dunhill v W Brook & Co and Crossley [2016] EWHC 165 (QB) provides helpful guidance on the standard of care when assessing cases and advising clients.

In 1999, the claimant, Ms Dunhill, sustained injuries as a result of being knocked over by a motorbike. She pursued the motorcyclist for damages and was represented by solicitors, W Brook & Co, and counsel, Mr Crossley. On the morning of the trial, the key witness in support of the claimant's case was not in attendance. Crossley advised the claimant to settle the claim for £12,500 plus costs. The trial was attended by a trainee from the first defendant firm, who was unable to advise and followed co...

Want to read on?

This article is part of our subscription-based access. Please pick one of the options below to continue.
Already registered? Login to access premium content

Single User

  • - 10 issues a year delivered to you
  • - Digital edition of the magazine
  • - Access to premium content
  • - Access to the SJ Archives
  • - Weekly email newsletter
  • - Access to the SJ community online
  • - Advanced search feature
  • - Online support
  • - Access to SJ app- coming soon!
  • - 6 special focuses per year
  • - Special offers on SJ and IICJ events

Corporate User

The Corporate IP Licence is tailored to your firm, making it the most cost effective way for the firm to access Solicitors Journal, and enables the firm to remain compliant with copyright and our Terms and Conditions. This gives you the ability to print and circulate articles within the firm.

To enquire about a Corporate IP Licence for your firm, please contact our Subscriptions Manager on george.miller@solicitorsjournal.com.